The hard part of AI-assisted writing is trust. LitSynth keeps generated review sections close to the selected evidence so users can inspect support before export.
Editable workflow
Each stage stays visible, so you can revise the scope or evidence choices before generating again.
Generate a review from selected papers.
Open citation and claim coverage checks.
Review weakly supported sections manually.
Revise, save, or export the final draft.
audit views focus attention before export
drafts are grounded in user-approved sources
designed for human verification, not blind publishing
LitSynth treats AI as support for a review process. You keep control of which papers enter the evidence set and which claims need another check.
Inspect which parts of a draft have strong source support.
Flag weaker claims that need human review.
Keep selected papers visible during synthesis review.
Export only after citation coverage has been checked.
Citation verification asks whether the title, authors and identifiers resolve to a real paper. Claim-support checking asks whether that paper supports the exact statement in your draft. LitSynth citation audit helps inspect support in the selected evidence; a real reference alone does not validate a claim. Read the original study to check population, design, direction of effect and limitations.
No. It helps expose evidence coverage so humans can review and revise the draft before use.
Systematic Review Beta includes stronger audit framing around evidence tables and PRISMA-lite methods notes.
Search papers, screen the evidence, generate a cited draft, and return to earlier decisions whenever the scope needs to change.
Start your review