Is this a full systematic review platform?
No. LitSynth supports a PRISMA-lite workflow for protocol notes, screening support, evidence tables, and report drafting. Full systematic reviews still require human review governance.
Systematic Review Beta
A systematic review AI tool that keeps screening decisions visible
Use LitSynth when a normal literature review needs a stricter protocol, clearer inclusion decisions, and an evidence table that can be inspected later.
Editable workflow
From research question to a review you can inspect
Each stage stays visible, so you can revise the scope or evidence choices before generating again.
- 1
Define the review question and screening intent.
- 2
Search and score candidate records.
- 3
Review AI screening recommendations before inclusion.
- 4
Generate a PRISMA-lite report with methods notes and evidence tables.
Best for
- Recording protocol and eligibility criteria
- Supporting title and abstract screening
- Building an evidence table and auditable draft
Not a replacement for
- Claiming complete PRISMA compliance or dual-reviewer screening
- Running a statistical meta-analysis
Facts on this page
- Mode
- Beta
- Screening
- Title/abstract
- Cost
- 100 credits
structured workflow for stricter teams
decision support before deeper full-text review
charged only after successful generation
Limits stated on this page
- Systematic Review Beta does not claim full PRISMA 2020 compliance.
- It does not replace dual independent screening or complete full-text review.
- It does not perform meta-analysis or Cochrane-level methodology.
Keep evidence decisions visible
LitSynth treats AI as support for a review process. You keep control of which papers enter the evidence set and which claims need another check.
Document title and abstract screening decisions.
Separate included, excluded, and uncertain evidence.
Create evidence tables before drafting the synthesis.
State methodological limits clearly in the generated report.
Questions researchers ask
Who can use Systematic Review Beta?
The current product gates Systematic Review Beta to eligible paid plans and enforces selected-paper limits on the server. A successful generation costs 100 credits.
Can I export the result?
Paid workflows support saved projects and export options. Users should review the audit notes before sharing outputs externally.
Continue your research workflow
Build the review, then revise any step
Search papers, screen the evidence, generate a cited draft, and return to earlier decisions whenever the scope needs to change.
Start your review