Move beyond a narrative PubMed search into a structured PRISMA-lite workflow: define eligibility criteria, screen with AI support, extract evidence, and draft a cited synthesis.
Editable workflow
Each stage stays visible, so you can revise the scope or evidence choices before generating again.
Enter a biomedical research question and confirm eligibility criteria.
Retrieve and screen candidate records with AI decision support.
Extract structured evidence from included papers.
Generate a cited synthesis with PRISMA-lite methods notes.
LitSynth treats AI as support for a review process. You keep control of which papers enter the evidence set and which claims need another check.
Define a focused biomedical question with eligibility criteria.
Screen retrieved records with AI relevance scoring and recommendations.
Extract study design, population, outcomes, and limitations per paper.
Generate a PRISMA-lite synthesis with citations and audit notes.
The PubMed literature review tool focuses on narrative review drafting from biomedical search results. This page covers the systematic review workflow: protocol definition, eligibility criteria, structured screening, evidence extraction into tables, and a PRISMA-lite synthesis with methods notes. Use the narrative tool for quick reviews; use this for reviews that need more rigor.
No. LitSynth provides a PRISMA-lite workflow, not Cochrane-grade methodology. It does not support dual independent screening, meta-analysis, or risk-of-bias tools like RoB 2. Use it for rapid reviews, scoping reviews, or early drafts before formal full-text appraisal.
LitSynth retrieves academic papers including biomedical literature. You should verify that the retrieved coverage matches your protocol requirements, especially if you need specific database combinations like Embase, CINAHL, or Cochrane CENTRAL.
Yes. The semaglutide obesity systematic review example shows a complete PRISMA-lite workflow with screening numbers, evidence table, and citation audit on a biomedical topic.
Search papers, screen the evidence, generate a cited draft, and return to earlier decisions whenever the scope needs to change.
Start your review