Is this a full systematic review platform?
No. LitSynth supports a PRISMA-lite workflow for protocol notes, screening support, evidence tables, and report drafting. Full systematic reviews still require human review governance.
Use LitSynth when a normal literature review needs a stricter protocol, clearer inclusion decisions, and an evidence table that can be inspected later.
Editable workflow
Each stage stays visible, so you can revise the scope or evidence choices before generating again.
Define the review question and screening intent.
Search and score candidate records.
Review AI screening recommendations before inclusion.
Generate a PRISMA-lite report with methods notes and evidence tables.
LitSynth treats AI as support for a review process. You keep control of which papers enter the evidence set and which claims need another check.
Document title and abstract screening decisions.
Separate included, excluded, and uncertain evidence.
Create evidence tables before drafting the synthesis.
State methodological limits clearly in the generated report.
No. LitSynth supports a PRISMA-lite workflow for protocol notes, screening support, evidence tables, and report drafting. Full systematic reviews still require human review governance.
The current product gates Systematic Review Beta to eligible paid plans and enforces selected-paper limits on the server.
Paid workflows support saved projects and export options. Users should review the audit notes before sharing outputs externally.
Search papers, screen the evidence, generate a cited draft, and return to earlier decisions whenever the scope needs to change.
Start your review